On Now
Coming Up
  • Sun., Dec. 21, 2014 12:00 PM - 3:00 PM CST Packers at Tampa Bay Buccaneers Packers at Tampa Bay Buccaneers
  • Mon., Dec. 22, 2014 6:00 PM - 7:00 PM CST Lacy, Clinton-Dix appearance Packers Eddie Lacy and Ha Ha Clinton-Dix are scheduled to appear at the Big Red Kettle at Bay Park Square Mall on behalf of the Salvation Army bell-ringing campaign.
  • Sat., Dec. 27, 2014 2:30 PM - 4:00 PM CST Alumni Appearance (Flanagan, Rivera) Mike Flanagan and Marco Rivera are scheduled to appear at the Packers Pro Shop on Saturday, December 27th, from 2:30-4 p.m.
  • Sun., Dec. 28, 2014 10:30 AM - 11:30 AM CST Alumni Appearance (Flanagan, Rivera)

    TTZ: Mike Flanagan
    Club Level: Marco Rivera

  • Sun., Dec. 28, 2014 12:00 PM - 3:00 PM CST Packers vs. Detroit Lions Packers vs. Detroit Lions
  • Sat., Jun. 20, 2015 12:00 PM CDT Kenny Chesney/Jason Aldean concert Jason Aldean and Kenny Chesney have announced that their tours, The Burn It Down Tour and The Big Revival Tour presented by Corona Light, will collide for 10 stadium shows next summer, including Lambeau Field on Saturday, June 20, 2015.  More on-sale information and special guests will be revealed over the coming weeks.

News

Print
RSS

Point, counterpoint: Should victory formation be protected from contact?

Posted Dec 4, 2012


Vic KetchmanPackers.com Editor Vic Ketchman says yes.

In keeping with the league’s major emphasis on player safety, the time-honored “victory formation,” the intent of which is for the quarterback to kneel with the ball for the purpose of extinguishing the time remaining on the game clock, should be protected from contact from the defense. Why? Because risking injury is unnecessary on a meaningless play.

Come on, ask yourself this question: When was the last time you saw a quarterback in victory formation fumble the snap from center and the defense recover? Hey, the Giants weren’t in victory formation when Herman Edwards executed the “Miracle in the Meadowlands.”

The victory formation and its subsequent exchange from center to quarterback is a signal for fans and players alike that this game is over. It’s been that way for a long time. Since we now have a coach that doesn’t understand that message, the players he wishes to put at risk need to be protected.

Here’s my idea: The quarterback will inform the referee of the offense’s intent to assume the victory formation. The referee will then inform the defense of the offense’s intent. At that point, the defense may not make contact with the offense. If the exchange is fumbled or the offense doesn’t execute the procedures according to the rules that govern victory formation, which will require an immediate and deliberate kneel down by the quarterback, the offense will incur a penalty and loss of down, and the clock will stop and the time will be restored.

Problem solved, no one injured. In fact, there’s probably a better chance of the defense recovering the ball in that system than there is in the current system.

Mike SpoffordPackers.com Staff Writer Mike Spofford says no.

Why do we have to legislate everything? Why does there need to be a procedure? The last thing the league needs is more rules and step-by-step handbooks.

Look, I’m not a fan of how a certain team is “defending” against the victory formation. I’m a fan of losing with some respect for the game and for the opponent.

If a team isn’t willing to lose that way, because of some new coach’s idea of teaching his team to play hard until the bitter end, then the teams and the players need to police themselves, find their own methods of enforcement. I think you know what I mean.

I’d rather have a league in which we can tell which teams – professional football teams – are capable of losing with dignity. If there’s one or more that can’t, deal with it the best you can at that moment, and then over time these things have a way of sorting themselves out.

I think over time, a coach that forces his players to put their own and others’ health and safety at risk for a one-in-a-gazillion chance at getting the ball back is a coach players won’t want to play for, and a coach players won’t want to play for is a coach an owner won’t be able to afford to keep employed in the NFL for very long. That’s what I think.

Don’t take the power away from the players. We’re dealing with an anomaly, and in the bigger picture the players are more closely aligned with their brethren than they are to any coaches. Players play this game for, among other things, respect, and in the long run they’ll want that from their fellow players more than they’ll want an “attaboy” from their coach after a loss.

I don’t think there will suddenly be a slew of teams adopting this type of “defense” against the victory formation. This won’t be a trend. It doesn’t need a new rule or a new procedure.

It just needs time. It’s professional football, and it will take care of itself.

Cast your vote in the poll on the right, please.

 
blog comments powered by Disqus

You May Also Be Interested in...

Recent Videos

  • Final Thoughts: Packers at Buccaneers

    (3:08) Posted 4 hours ago

    Packers.com's Vic Ketchman and Mike Spofford preview the Green Bay Packers' Sunday matchup against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Vic and Mike talk about what's at stake, players to watch, and ways the Packers can win.

  • Trailer: Packers at Buccaneers

    (2:27) Posted Dec 19, 2014

    The Green Bay Packers head to Tampa to take on the Buccaneers in Week 16, following a loss to the Buffalo Bills in Week 15.

  • Playbook: Green Bay Packers vs. Buccaneers

    (2:23) Posted Dec 19, 2014

    The "Playbook" crew talks about Green Bay Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers and his struggles in Tampa Bay.