On Now
Coming Up
  • Sat., Apr. 26, 2014 8:00AM - 6:00PM CDT Packers Pro Shop Tent Sale

    The sale is taking place earlier than in previous years, due to the construction at Lambeau Field and the work that the Pro Shop team must complete in preparation for the new store, which will open this summer. Visitors to Lambeau Field should enter the Atrium through the Oneida Nation Gate. Parking is available in the lot on Lambeau Field’s east side near the Oneida Nation Gate, which can be accessed off Oneida Street and Lombardi Avenue.

    The sale will feature the traditional mix of Pro Shop items greatly reduced in price and other special purchases.

    The team’s football operations staff also has provided Packers team apparel no longer in use, including a large assortment of t-shirts, shorts, jackets, jerseys and pants. Some items are practice-worn gear not normally available in the Pro Shop.

    The tent sale began in 1994 in the parking lot outside the former Pro Shop on the north end of Lambeau Field and grew into a popular event. Now in its 11th year in the Atrium, the tent sale also was held in the west side stadium concourse in previous years.

  • Sat., May. 10, 2014 7:00PM CDT Eddie Lacy appearance 22nd Annual Doug Jirschele Memorial Sports Award Banquet
  • Sat., Jun. 07, 2014 8:30AM - 3:30PM CDT JPP Kids Clinic

    The 17th annual Junior Power Pack Kids Clinic is set for Saturday, June 7, 2014 in the Don Hutson Center with sessions ranging from 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.

    The Junior Power Pack Clinic gives members ages 5-14 years old the opportunity to practice football skills and drills with other Packers backers and a few up-and-coming Packers players.  Parents/Guardians are welcome to come and watch their child/ren participate in the clinic. 

    Members may choose one of three sessions to attend:

    • Session 1 – 8:30 to 10 a.m.
    • Session 2 – 11 to 12:30 p.m.
    • Session 3 – 2 to 3:30 p.m.

    The event will be held inside the Don Hutson Center, the Packers indoor practice facility. Parking for the event is available in the lot on Lambeau Field’s east side near the Oneida Nation Gate.  

    The Junior Power Pack Clinic is a member’s only event and will have a registration fee of $5.

    Deadline to register:

    • New Members – May 11, 2014
    • Current Members – May 18, 2014

    To sign up to become a member of the Junior Power Pack and receive an invitation to the clinic fans can go to www.packers.com/jpp.

  • Sat., Jun. 14, 2014 2:30PM CDT Jerry Parins Cruise for Cancer

    The eleventh annual Jerry Parins Cruise for Cancer motorcycle ride will be held, rain or shine, on Saturday, June 14, 2014. The ride will start at Vandervest Harley-Davidson (1966 Velp Avenue, Green Bay) and will make a fun-filled stop at the Seymour Fireman's Picnic, held at the Outagamie County Fairgrounds in Seymour.

    Ride Day Schedule

    • 9-10:30 am: Registration at Vandervest Harley-Davidson, Geen Bay
    • 11 am: Depart Vandervest Harley-Davidson, Green Bay
    • 12 pm: Arrive in Seymour. Enjoy food, beverages, entertainment and a short program.
    • 2:30 pm: Party kicks off at the new South Endzone Festival Foods MVP Deck at Lambeau Field! Guests can access the space by way of the Shopko Gate. See the field and enjoy the atmosphere from this beautiful indoor/outdoor space newly opened and accessed by very few. The party will include silent and live auction, food, beverages, music and merchandise available for purchase.

    More information: http://cruiseforcancer.org/




Point, counterpoint: Is automatic replay review for turnovers a good rule change?

Posted Mar 29, 2012

Mike SpoffordPackers.com Staff Writer Mike Spofford says yes.

When instant replay was expanded last year to include automatic review of all scoring plays, I had several conversations with my brethren in the press box that the next logical step would be to automatically review turnovers, too.

It only makes sense. Other than the obvious (points), what statistically has the biggest impact on winning and losing football games? Turnovers. They’re too important not to make sure the calls are right.

I don’t care if it takes a few extra seconds or minutes. I’d rather spend a few minutes to get a critical call right than countless days discussing avoidable controversy later.

A coach shouldn’t have to challenge a play that’s ruled a fumble or interception. Remember those back-to-back Packers games in 2010 against the Jets and Cowboys?

The Packers benefited from a questionable interception against the Jets and a bogus fumble on a kickoff that was returned for a touchdown against the Cowboys. The opposing coaches couldn’t challenge because they were out of challenges and the plays didn’t happen in the last two minutes of either half. Those moments highlighted the shortcomings of a system that needed this type of modification, because the plays were so impactful.

I’m not sure if Charles Woodson’s pick against the Jets would have been overturned, but it at least should have been looked at. I know the Dallas fumble that Nick Collins scooped up and ran back for a score would have been overturned, because the return man was down by contact. It was a gift touchdown that either last year’s expansion of replay or this new one would fix very easily.

This change to replay also eliminates the possibility, however far-fetched, of a really absurd situation based on last year’s new rule. Imagine a player picks up a fumble that might not be a fumble and takes off down the sideline toward the end zone. If he’s aware enough to realize the other team is out of challenges and the clock isn’t under two minutes in either half, he just might step out of bounds on the 1-yard line rather than score. That way, the play won’t be automatically reviewed because it’s not a TD. Or, a player in pursuit of the fumble returner may decide not to tackle him because if he scores, the whole thing might come back.

Yeah, I know, that’s nuts and insanely unlikely to happen, but when I just saw a Super Bowl decided by a player who was being allowed to score, yet, was trying not to score and fell inadvertently across the goal line, I’m not ruling out anything in the realm of the absurd.

The NFL is probably moving toward a system in which all close calls ultimately get reviewed, and as long as the league can find a way to do that quickly and efficiently, I’m all for it. Let’s face it, modern technology has provided better eyes in the sky than humans can provide on the field. There’s no debating that.

Then, again, maybe it won’t get to that point. I don’t know. In the meantime, selecting the most statistically significant plays in a game – scores, and now turnovers – for automatic review is progress for a replay system that the league is smart enough to realize should always be “under review.”

Vic KetchmanPackers.com Editor Vic Ketchman says no.

I’ll be brief and to the point.

OK, so in the never-ending pursuit to get it right, we’re now going to lengthen the time of game so we might review all calls that result in a turnover. I have a question: What about all plays that were wrongly ruled on the field to have not resulted in turnover? Are we going to stop the game and automatically review them?




Oh, that’s great. Longer games and more selective use of the replay review system, and we’re still not going to get it right.

Hey, guys, don’t you understand what you’re doing? You’re upsetting the balance between right and wrong. It’s not evening out because you’re selecting some wrongs to correct and allowing other wrongs to stay wrong.

I like the idea of automatically reviewing all turnovers. Every coach will tell you that turnovers are the difference between winning and losing, so if we’re going to get any call right, let’s get this one right. But what about the plays that should’ve been ruled turnovers?

The answer to that question is that the coaches will still have to challenge those calls, and that leads me to my next question: What about the down-by-contact play? It’s a close call and the coach wants more information from his coaches upstairs before he decides to spend a challenge he might need later in the game, but TV is slow with the replay and the opponent rushes to snap the ball and the coach has neither the time nor the information he needs to throw his red flag.

Then, a few seconds later, we see the replay and the broadcasters loudly proclaim, “That’s a fumble!” but it’s too late now because the system doesn’t allow for repair, only regret. It turns out to be the play that decides the game, which means that a wrong wasn’t fixed and the team that won probably should’ve lost. Yuk!

So why can’t we automatically review that play, too? If we’re going to spend this extra time to get it right, can’t we spend a little more time to make sure we get ALL turnovers right? Or shouldn’t all calls involving the potential for turnover at least be treated the same?

What do you think?

blog comments powered by Disqus
Vote Here!
What was the Packers' play of the year in 2013?